中国组织工程研究

中国组织工程研究 ›› 2012, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (28): 5170-5174.doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 2095-4344.2012.28. 009

• 组织构建实验造模 experimental modeling in tissue construction • 上一篇    下一篇

抑郁情绪模型大鼠旷场数据的聚合分析

苏云祥1, 2，魏 盛1, 2，谭 倩2，柳 新2，杜希扬1,2   

  1. 1山东中医药大学脑行为分析实验室，山东省济南市 250355；
    2山东中医药大学中医药经典理论教育部重点实验室，山东省济南市 250355
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-03 修回日期:2011-11-24 出版日期:2012-07-08 发布日期:2012-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 魏盛，讲师，山东中医药大学脑行为分析实验室，山东省济南市 250355 waysaint@ 163.com
  • 作者简介:苏云祥★，男，1984年生，山东省烟台市人，汉族，山东中医药大学在读硕士，主要从事中药调肝方药药理研究。 suyunxiangben@hotmail.com

Aggregate analysis of open field data in depression model rats

Su Yun-xiang1, 2, Wei Sheng1, 2, Tan Qian2, Liu Xin2, Du Xi-yang1, 2   

  1. 1Brain Behavior Laboratory, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China
    2Key Laboratory of Classical Theory for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2011-11-03 Revised:2011-11-24 Online:2012-07-08 Published:2012-07-08
  • Contact: Wei Sheng, Lecturer, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China; Key Laboratory of Classical Theory for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China
  • About author:Su Yun-xiang★, Studying for master’s degree, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China; Key Laboratory of Classical Theory for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China suyunxiangben@hotmail.com

PDF

630

被引次数

16

摘要：

背景：多次测量正常大鼠的旷场数据，以加和方式进行数据聚合，可显著提高旷场指标的稳定性与一致性，此方法对造模后大鼠的旷场行为是否适用？
目的：分析抑郁情绪模型大鼠旷场实验中活动量总得分的最佳聚合方式。
方法：采用慢性温和刺激法复制抑郁情绪大鼠模型。在4周的造模过程中，每隔1周采集1次旷场行为学指标。采用两两聚合的分析方法(连续聚合，间隔聚合，立意聚合)处理数据，比对不同聚合手段对模型制备信度及相关性的影响。
结果与结论：①一致性系数Kappa结果：间隔聚合与立意聚合的聚合方式都能得到较好的可信度(Kappa=0.611，P < 0.05)，连续聚合方式可信度一般(Kappa=0.222)。②组内相关系数ICC结果：只有立意聚合的可信度极好(ICC=0.835，P < 0.01)，间隔聚合方式呈较好可信度(ICC=0.792，P < 0.05)，连续聚合方式可信度差(ICC=0.196)。说明恰当的立意聚合可以大幅提升抑郁情绪大鼠旷场数据的可信度与稳定性。

关键词: 旷场实验, 抑郁情绪, 动物模型, 数据聚合, 可信度

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Repeated measurements of open field data and proper data aggregation based on additivity can significantly improve the stability and consistency of the open field test in normal rats. Is this method applicable to model rats?
OBJECTIVE: To explore the best aggregate measurement of ambulation score in the open-field test of the depression model rats.
METHODS: Depression models in rats were constructed using chronic mild stimulation method. The open-field behavior indicators were collected every two weeks during the model construction course of 4 weeks. Pairwise aggregation analysis (continuous aggregation, interval aggregation, judgmental aggregation) was used. Effects of different aggregation methods on reliability and correlation of model preparation were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Consistency coefficient Kappa showed that good reliability and correlation were obtained using interval aggregation and judgmental aggregation (Kappa=0.611, P < 0.05). The reliability gained using continuous aggregation was passable (Kappa=0.222). Intraclass correlation coefficient ICC showed that an excellent reliability was gained using judgmental aggregation (ICC=0.835, P < 0.01); the reliability gained using interval aggregation was good (ICC=0.792, P < 0.05)，and the reliability gained using continuous aggregation was poor (ICC=0.196). It indicates that a proper judgment aggregation can significantly improve the reliability and correlation of the open-field data in depression model rats.

中图分类号: